Journal of Education in Developing Areas
Home > Vol 28, No 1 > Nwankwo

THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL AND VIRTUAL FIELD TRIP METHODS OF INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS’ SOCIAL STUDIES PERFORMANCE

Ngozi Beatrice Nwankwo

Abstract


This study examined the effects of lecture, virtual and physical field trip methods of instruction on the academic achievement of secondary school students in social studies. The design of the study was a 4x3 pre-test, post-test, quasi-experimental study. A sample of onç hundred and thirty six JSS3 students participated in the study. Four research questions were answered and four hypotheses tested at 0.05 level of significance. The instruments for pre-treatment data collection were Social Studies Aptitude Test and Social Studies Achievement Test which were validated through the assistance of three experts in social studies. The reliability coefficients of Social Studies Aptitude Test and Social Studies Achievement Test obtained through Kuder Richardson 20 technique are 0.74 and 0.82 respectively. Each instrument was a 30-item multiple choice objective test. The data collected were analyzed using the mean and standard deviation for the research questions. Hypotheses one, two and three were tested using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) while hypothesis four was tested using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at 0.05 level of significance. The results of this study showed that virtual field trip as well as physical field trip had significant effects on the academic achievement of the students in social studies. There was a significant difference in the post-test mean scores of students taught with lecture method and those taught with virtual field trip in favour of those taught using virtual field trip. A significant difference also existed in the post-test mean scores of students taught with lecture and those taught with physical field trip in favour of those taught using physical field trip. A significant difference was also found in post-test mean scores of students taught with virtual field trip and those taught using physical field trip in favour of those taught using physical field trip. Based on these findings, it was recommended that, when appropriate, social studies teachers should intersperse traditional methods of instruction with physical field trip to improve the students’ learning. Where it not possible to adopt physical field trip to teach a group of students because of cost and safety concerns, more cost effective and safer virtual field trip can be used as a substitute to the physical field trip.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Raheem , Y. (2006). Effect of field trip method of teaching on students’ performance in social studies. Journal of Education. 25, 8-19

Ajaja, O.P. (2010). Effects of field studies on learning outcome in Biology. Journal of Human Ecology, 31(3)171-177

Borich, G. D. (2004). Effective teaching methods. 5th Edition. New Jersey.

Dallman, J., McClellan, T. & Cahoon, C. (2010). Virtual field trips. Retrieved August 2011, from http://ccahoon.wikispaces.com/Virtual+Field+trip.

Ejigbo, K. R. (2017). Comparative performance of students taught using different methods of instruction. International Journal Educational Curriculum Theory and Practice, 5 (9), 192-199

Foley, K. (2003).The big pocket guide to using and creating virtualfield trlps: Tramline. ISBN 0-9716154-0-3

Garner, F. T. (2014).Effects of physical versus virtual field trips on students’ achievement in estuarine ecology and their attitude towards science. Journal of Biological Sciences. 27 (18) 98-124

Gamer, L. C. & Gallo, M. A. (2005). Field trips and their effect on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Science Teaching: Research and Teaching. 6 (3) 11-18

Hamilton-Ekeke, J. T. (2007). Relative effectiveness of expository and field trip methods of teaching on students’ achievement in ecology. International Journal of Science Education. 29 (15) 1869-1889

Heinich, R. Molenda, M. Russell, J. D. and Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Igbokwe, U.O. (1995). The effects of the use of Bloom’s, Keller’s and integrated models of mastery learning on geography learning outcomes. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan.

Johnson, G. B. & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research. Boston: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Krepel, W. J., & Duvall, C. R. (2010). Field trip: A guide for planning and conducting educational experiences. Washington, D. C: National Education Association.

Michie, M. (1998). Factors influencing secondary science teachers to organize and conduct field trips. Australian Science Teacher’s Journal, 44 (4) 43-5 0

Mezieobi, K. A., Fubara, V. R. & Mezieobi, S. A. (2008). Social studies in Nigeria: Teaching methods, instructional materials and resources. Owerri: Acadapeak Publishers

Okunola, 0. (1985). Basic concepts in educational psychology. Lagos: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd

Postlethwaite, T. N. (2007). Evaluating teacher competence through the use performance assessment task: An overview. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5 (1)121-132.

Prokop, P., Tuncer, G. & Kvasnic, R. (2007). Short term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16 (3), 24-41.

Thomson, N. D. (2018). Introduction to social studied. Ankra: Spring Publishers

Vikoo, B. (2014). Learning theories and instructional processes. Owerri: Springfield Publishers.

Winike, S. T. (2019). Teaching of social studies in Nigeria. Ibadan: Goldplate Publishing Ltd.




Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education in Developing Areas

Copyright @ Faculty of Education, University of Port Harcourt